The effectiveness in improving mobility with the surgical method of osseointegration in amputation of long bones of the lower limbs comparing to the use of conventional prostheses: a scope review

Authors

  • Arthur Souza Menezes
  • Bruno Xavier Torres Ferreira
  • Iane da Rocha Temporal
  • José Ferreira de Castro Neto
  • Thaís Florêncio Universidade de Pernambuco - UPE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-1099
  • Luan Fernandes Lins
  • Hugo Rafael de Souza e Silva Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37085/jmmv4.n2.2022.pp.6-17

Keywords:

Osseointegration, Rehabilitation, Mobility, Lower members

Abstract

Objective

Conduct a scoping review of the available literature on the effectiveness of the surgical method of osseointegration in improving mobility, when compared to the conventional prosthesis, in cases of amputation of long bones of the lower limbs.

Method

This is a Scope Review, according to the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and systematized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The descriptors “osseointegration”, “femoral amputation”, “tibial amputation” and “rehabilitation” were used in PubMed, SciELO and MEDLINE databases to conduct the study.

Results

Of the 151 articles selected, 32 remained after applying the exclusion criteria. The data from the articles studied in this scope review brought comparisons between the various aspects involved in the use of both types of prosthesis, converging on the finding that osseointegrated prosthesis provide a greater improvement in mobility and quality of life when compared to conventional socket prosthesis.

Conclusion

The analysis of the articles shows that there are significant benefits of the osseointegrated prosthesis in improving mobility comparing to traditional prostheses with prosthetic socket, but there is still a large amount of literature to be created, and more research and case follow-ups to be carried out. Due to the finding of results showing mobility improvement in its different aspects, it is evident the need for more studies focusing on the evaluation of rehabilitation, because, although there are articles that cite functional and physical improvements, it is noted that the number of studies about the topic is still very precarious.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

LU, S. et al. Experimental Investigation of Vibration Analysis on Implant Stability for a Novel Implant Design. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), v. 22, n. 4, p. 1685, 21 fev. 2022.

REETZ, D. et al. Safety and Performance of Bone-Anchored Prostheses in Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, v. 102, n. 15, p. 1329–1335, 27 abr. 2020.

HANSEN, R. L. et al. Does migration of osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputees predict later revision? A prospective 2-year radiostereometric analysis with 5-years clinical follow-up. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, v. 105, n. 5, p. 1013–1020, set. 2019.

MATTHEWS, D. J. et al. UK trial of the Osseointegrated Prosthesis for the Rehabilitation for Amputees. Prosthetics & Orthotics International, v. 43, n. 1, p. 112–122, fev. 2019.

HANSEN, C. H. et al. The process of becoming a user of an osseointegrated prosthesis following transfemoral amputation: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, v. 41, n. 3, p. 276–283, 29 set. 2017.

HAGBERG, K. Bone-anchored prostheses in patients with traumatic bilateral transfemoral amputations: rehabilitation description and outcome in 12 cases treated with the OPRA implant system. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, v. 14, n. 4, p. 346–353, 14 mar. 2018.

MUDERIS, M. A. et al. Two-Stage Osseointegrated Reconstruction of Post-traumatic Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees. Military Medicine, v. 183, n. suppl_1, p. 496–502, 1 mar. 2018.

PROCHOR, P.; SAJEWICZ, E. A comparative analysis of internal bone remodelling concepts in a novel implant for direct skeletal attachment of limb prosthesis evaluation: A finite element analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, v. 232, n. 3, p. 289–298, 19 jan. 2018.

GUIRAO, L. et al. Osteointegración con el sistema Keep Walking Advanced ® en una paciente amputada transfemoral. Rehabilitación, v. 51, n. 2, p. 129–133, abr. 2017.

HOFFMEISTER, T.; SCHWARZE, F.; ASCHOFF, H. H. Das Endo-Exo-Prothesen-Versorgungskonzept. Der Unfallchirurg, v. 120, n. 5, p. 371–377, maio 2017.

MCGOUGH, R. L. et al. The Compress® transcutaneous implant for rehabilitation following limb amputation. Der Unfallchirurg, v. 120, n. 4, p. 300–305, 8 mar. 2017.

BLUMENTRITT, S. Funktion exoprothetischer Bauteile bei Beinamputierten mit osseointegrierten, perkutan ausgeleiteten Implantaten. Der Unfallchirurg, v. 120, n. 5, p. 385–394, 9 mar. 2017.

MUDERIS, M. A. et al. The Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol (OGAAP-1) for two-stage osseointegrated reconstruction of amputated limbs. The Bone & Joint Journal, v. 98-B, n. 7, p. 952–960, jul. 2016.

HAGBERG, K.; HANSSON, E.; BRÅNEMARK, R. Outcome of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prostheses for Patients With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation at Two-Year Follow-Up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, v. 95, n. 11, p. 2120–2127, nov. 2014.

HAGGSTROM, E. E.; HANSSON, E.; HAGBERG, K. Comparison of prosthetic costs and service between osseointegrated and conventional suspended transfemoral prostheses. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, v. 37, n. 2, p. 152–160, 20 ago. 2012.

LUNDBERG, M.; HAGBERG, K.; BULLINGTON, J. My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, v. 35, n. 2, p. 207–214, jun. 2011.

SULLIVAN, J. et al. Rehabilitation of the transfemoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis. Prosthetics & Orthotics International, v. 27, n. 2, p. 114–120, ago. 2003

VAN DE MEENT, H.; HOPMAN, M. T.; FRÖLKE, J. P. Walking Ability and Quality of Life in Subjects With Transfemoral Amputation: A Comparison of Osseointegration With Socket Prostheses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, v. 94, n. 11, p. 2174–2178, nov. 2013.

THOMSON, S. et al. Proximal Bone Remodeling in Lower Limb Amputees Reconstructed With an Osseointegrated Prosthesis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, v. 37, n. 12, p. 2524–2530, 29 ago. 2019.

LEIJENDEKKERS, R. A. et al. Gait rehabilitation for a patient with an osseointegrated prosthesis following transfemoral amputation. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, v. 33, n. 2, p. 147–161, 3 jan. 2017.

ATALLAH, R. et al. Safety, prosthesis wearing time and health-related quality of life of lower extremity bone-anchored prostheses using a press-fit titanium osseointegration implant: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study. PLOS ONE, v. 15, n. 3, p. e0230027, 9 mar. 2020.

ONTARIO HEALTH (QUALITY). Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series, v. 19, n. 7, p. 1–126, 2019.

ATALLAH, R. et al. Osseointegrated Transtibial Implants in Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, v. 99, n. 18, p. 1516–1523, 20 set. 2017.

BRÅNEMARK, R. et al. A novel osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system for the treatment of patients with transfemoral amputation. The Bone & Joint Journal, v. 96-B, n. 1, p. 106–113, jan. 2014.

NISWANDER, W.; WANG, W.; BAUMANN, A. P. Erratum to “Characterizing Loads at Transfemoral Osseointegrated Implants.” [Medical Engineering and Physics 84 (2020) 103–114]. Medical Engineering & Physics, v. 94, p. 51, ago. 2021.

JUHNKE, D.-L. .; ASCHOFF, H.-H. . Endo-Exo-Prothesen nach Gliedmaßenamputation. Der Orthopäde, v. 44, n. 6, p. 419–425, 14 maio 2015.

AL MUDERIS, M.; LU, W.; LI, J. J. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb for the treatment of lower limb amputations. Der Unfallchirurg, v. 120, n. 4, p. 306–311, 9 jan. 2017.

GUIRAO, L. et al. Improvement in walking abilities in transfemoral amputees with a distal weight bearing implant. Prosthetics & Orthotics International, v. 41, n. 1, p. 26–32, fev. 2017.

RANKER, A. et al. [Transcutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthetic Systems (TOPS) for Transfemoral Amputees - A Six-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Latest Prosthetic Design in Germany]. Die Rehabilitation, v. 59, n. 6, p. 357–365, 1 dez. 2020.

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Souza Menezes, A., Ferreira, B. X. T., Temporal, I. da R., Ferreira de Castro Neto, J., Florêncio, T., Lins, L. F., & Silva, H. R. de S. e. (2022). The effectiveness in improving mobility with the surgical method of osseointegration in amputation of long bones of the lower limbs comparing to the use of conventional prostheses: a scope review. Jornal Memorial Da Medicina, 4(2), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.37085/jmmv4.n2.2022.pp.6-17

Issue

Section

Revisões

Categories